Show HN: A word of the day that doesn't suck

I’ve long thought that the Word of the Day was a wasted genre. The goal should be to give you words you can use; to enrich your understanding of words you already know; or at least to use words to tell you something neat about the world.

Instead, what you usually get is words that will never be used in conversation, held up as curios. Some examples from Dictionary.com’s daily email: thewless, balladmonger, vagility, contextomy. These words are... not useful.

I’ve always thought I could do better. My friend Ben recently created a daily puzzle game, called Bracket City, launched here on HN [1], which I like because it takes about the same amount of time as Wordle but has some of the variety and artistry of a good crossword.

Ben agreed to let me write a word of the day for the game’s audience. We’ve collected them all here: https://bracket.city/words. It’s such a joy to write -- every day, I pay homage to a word I love or use or have newly discovered. I find myself paying more attention to words I encounter, thinking if they deserve a place.

It’s also fun for another reason. Many years ago I wrote a blog post, "You’re probably using the wrong dictionary" [2], that made the rounds and actually still finds new readers today. It was about how the modern-day dictionaries we find by default on our iPhones and web browsers are actually kind of bureaucratic and lifeless. Through a writer I love, John McPhee, I rediscovered Webster’s 1913 dictionary, which feels like it was written by a thinking person who loved words. I still consult it all the time. Writing a word of the day has reminded me just how delightful and useful Webster’s old dictionary is -- and reacquainted me with the OED, which I now look to every day, and which I discovered you can access with your library card.

Some of my favorite entries so far: sophisticated, twee, gravitas, blockbuster, meteorologist, send, bid. There are more than 175 now -- and more coming once a day, every day, for as long as Bracket City stands.

To sign up to see each word of the day as it’s published, go to https://bracket.city/words.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43622719

[2] https://jsomers.net/blog/dictionary

53 points | by jsomers 22 hours ago

9 comments

  • seabass 16 hours ago
    When it comes to getting a deeper understanding of words you already know, two of my favorite resources are Etymonline [1] and the 1913 edition of Webster’s dictionary [2]. And if you’re curious why 1913 specifically, this post [3] gives a great overview.

    [1] https://www.etymonline.com/

    [2] https://www.websters1913.com/

    [3] https://jsomers.net/blog/dictionary

  • dang 17 hours ago
    Related:

    Thank HN: The puzzle game I posted here 6 weeks ago got licensed by The Atlantic - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43622719 - April 2025 (169 comments)

    Show HN: Bracket City – A daily, exploded (?) crossword puzzle - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43160542 - Feb 2025 (53 comments)

  • xnx 17 hours ago
  • robertlutece 3 hours ago
    I've had Merriam-Webster's Word of the Day [1] feed on my RSS reader for a while and I think these are quite usable.

    [1] https://www.merriam-webster.com/word-of-the-day/calendar

  • jsejcksn 3 hours ago
    Is there a public API (or a plan for one)? I'd be interested to see each WOTD in my custom new tab page.
  • Y_Y 17 hours ago
    No cap, but the first ten-ish were already well known to me. Might be worth mentioning you're pitching below not-particularly-well-read this guy.
    • wahnfrieden 17 hours ago
      With entries like "marketing" the point must be in the elaboration and not in the introduction of the word
    • Dilettante_ 17 hours ago
      Bruh said "no cap" on HN
      • janfoeh 16 hours ago
        > Bruh

        Those who live in glass houses should not attempt to hang paintings, methinks.

        • Dilettante_ 15 hours ago
          Could it be at all possible that I did that on purpose? Perchance I chose to make the exact "mistake" the GP made, and call him out for it at the same time because the irony of it would be funny?

          You must think other people are deeply, abysmally, troglodytically stupid if you thought one could make that comment without self-awareness.

          • janfoeh 12 hours ago
            Maybe you did, maybe you didn't. If you did, then maybe you did not do a very good job of communicating that? I mean, until telepathy over TCP finally arrives, all we have to go on is basically ASCII.

            > You must think other people are deeply, abysmally, troglodytically stupid if you thought one could make that comment without self-awareness.

            I suspect you inhabit a different part of the Internet than me. I envy you.

        • 1attice 16 hours ago
          They could use those little sticky velcro 'Commander' strips and it would work out ok
          • janfoeh 16 hours ago
            Point well taken.
  • deepzn 10 hours ago
    Nice, anoter James Somers blog post/project, I like. Love your articles, dude. And have a bunch on my reading list to catch up on.
  • fsckboy 14 hours ago
    what would make a "word of the day" stream compelling to me would be a word that reflected recent news. William Safire did this to some extent in his weekly column in the NY Times and it was usually pretty interesting.

    a way to increase the discovery of relevance could be looking up the etymologies of words that pop up, I'm always fascinated by how complex and interesting etymologies are

  • wnc3141 17 hours ago
    I think it would be interesting to incorporate loan words or phrases. Often these words become loan words because there's no good English equivalents so loan words/phrases sort of expand our ability to grapple these concepts.