> What aspects of humanity are so fundamentally human that we don't want to automate them?
That's a black hole question, essentially.
The artist would say it's art. The lawmaker would say it's law. The tinkerer would say it's tinkering, and so on.
It's so easy to answer and reveal something about yourself without actually revealing something about the issues with AI.
It's also a very broad question. Maybe it deserves a very broad answer, such as "I don't want it to automate anything that could unjustly lead to shifts in societal power dynamics". I think the answer puts the issue in the foreground, without being too narrow or easily dismissed as personal point of view.
That's a black hole question, essentially.
The artist would say it's art. The lawmaker would say it's law. The tinkerer would say it's tinkering, and so on.
It's so easy to answer and reveal something about yourself without actually revealing something about the issues with AI.
It's also a very broad question. Maybe it deserves a very broad answer, such as "I don't want it to automate anything that could unjustly lead to shifts in societal power dynamics". I think the answer puts the issue in the foreground, without being too narrow or easily dismissed as personal point of view.