6 comments

  • bobsterlobster 3 days ago
    MSI shipped a genuinely good motherboard and forgot to wire one chip, so PWM doesn't work. Instead of tossing the board or living with the noise, I decided to make lemonade.

    An Arduino Nano generates the 25kHz PWM signal, and a companion Windows application reads CPU temp and sends the duty cycle over serial. The Arduino firmware is open source (MIT).

    • haktan 12 hours ago
      Could you use an audio out port for creating the signal and ditch the Arduino?
      • magicalhippo 11 hours ago
        That might work for the PWM signal, however you'd still need some electronics as the fan has internal pull-up to 5V and expects it to be pulled low by the PWM signal.

        But a small circuit with a Schmitt-trigger inverter IC and some resistors and capacitors might do the trick, for example.

    • gzread 14 hours ago
      What if Windows crashes? It's better to attach a thermal sensor to the heatsink, I think.
      • johndough 13 hours ago
        Just send a heartbeat every few milliseconds and set fan speed to 100% if it died. Bonus: You get an audible indicator that the system crashed.
      • crote 8 hours ago
        Well, what if?

        We don't live in the AMD Athlon era[0] anymore. Modern CPUs are designed to boost until they hit a thermal limit, improper cooling is just going to result in a lower clock speed.

        [0]: https://youtu.be/UoXRHexGIok?t=55

        • joe_mamba 7 hours ago
          Damn, that video took me waaay back.
  • rasz 11 hours ago
    >This board has a Fintek F71878AD, a perfectly capable Super IO controller that can read temperatures, control fan PWM, and monitor fan speeds, but MSI just didn't connect it to the board.

    is not true. There is a diagram available for this mobo and U32 (F71889AD) is connected over LPC (modern serial ISA version). Its a full Super IO and it cant be _not connected_ as it also provides keyboard/mouse, serial and printer ports.

    The problem must lie elsewhere, most likely bad BIOS.

    >Here's what I knew:

    > Windows can read CPU temperature directly from the CPU's internal thermal diode, completely bypassing the useless Super IO chip.

    why not read temperature directly from Fintek using HwInfo?

    https://www.hwinfo.com/forum/threads/faulty-sensor-readings-... and yes it also works on 970 https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?threads/msi-970-cpu-temps...

    not to mention MSI Command Center can read those sensors AND set FAN speeds/curves, and most likely also SpeedFan.

    > asked LLMs

    LLM failed this person :(

    • wildzzz 6 hours ago
      Yeah I was going to say that the presence of a PS/2 port almost certainly means it has a SuperI/O chip wired up. You wouldn't be able to shutdown the PC without the LPC bus talking to the SuperI/O. MSI just didn't write code to talk to the fan controller or just didn't bother with displaying it in the BIOS config page.
      • rasz 5 hours ago
        There are multiple pictures of msi 970 master bios displaying temps and fans just fine so it did work at some point in time. Author either updated to some poorly validated bugfix only/beta bios, or maybe wrong bios for the board.
    • nottorp 10 hours ago
      ... but he had fun doing it!
  • venzaspa 12 hours ago
    Ironic, the day after the launch of Artemis II that people are using microcontrollers far more powerful than the original Apollo 11 navigation computer to control a single fan in their PCs now.
    • dv_dt 11 hours ago
      One could go farther and complain that it's a waste of a microcontroller at all to control a fan when an analog circuit for fan speed vs temperature would work fine.
      • adrian_b 9 hours ago
        True, a very simple analog circuit would be enough.

        However the bane of analog circuits was that they age, so a control circuit that works perfectly today will drift and no longer work as intended after some years.

        The second problem is that analog circuits need adjustments to set them at the exact desired parameters.

        Adjustments can be done either by using an adjustable element in the circuit, e.g. an adjustable resistor or capacitor or inductor, or by measuring many resistors and/or capacitors and/or inductors and selecting the ones with the right values to be used by your device.

        Redoing periodically the adjustments also solves the aging problem. However, both the initial adjustment and any periodic readjustments need a lot of work, so they are no longer acceptable in the industry.

        When doing something for yourself, you may make an analog controller and the initial adjustment would not be a problem, but even in this case it would be annoying to keep track and remember something like having to readjust a fan controller every 6 months, to be sure that it still works as intended.

        • MisterTea 6 hours ago
          You're over thinking it. If the application is very simple and needs to do one thing, an analog system works fine. Once you start needing sequencing, multiple adjustments, and maybe a little smarts then a CPU can get involved.

          I worked at a shop that had an old closed loop water-air chiller for a laser. The water temperature controller was a small PCB with an op-amp chip with some passives and the temperature was set by a potentiometer. That thing ran fine until the compressor died and it sent to scrap.

        • crote 8 hours ago
          Analog control circuitry is also really hard to patch in production, or to adjust to different behavior during design.

          Oh, you need a quadratic fan curve instead of a linear one? Have fun starting from scratch!

          • wildzzz 6 hours ago
            You can definitely make a PID controller just with opamps and potentiometers.
            • crote 6 hours ago
              I bet you can. But you can't turn a simple single linear amplifier into a PID controller with zero physical changes, can you?

              My point was that, if you want additional behavior, you need to bake that in from the start. With an MCU you can trivially switch it in-the-field to literally anything you can imagine.

      • pjc50 10 hours ago
        Nah, it's a much lower part count and much simpler to put a microcontroller in. If you're concerned about cost cheaper parts are available.
        • MisterTea 6 hours ago
          Yup. You could use a quad opamp to build a PWM controller with closed loop control but then you need all the passives to setup the oscillator and so on.

          I went through this years ago making a fan driver for my vehicles HVAC blower. The analog setup was fun to make but you use more board space, higher BOM count, and really, higher BOM cost vs a micro-controller.

          • fragmede 10 minutes ago
            It's crazy how far technology has advanced. A μc with RAM and a bunch of input and output ports and some code is cheaper today than a pile of analog components.
  • rurban 13 hours ago
    I've built 4 different fan controllers for my companies' embedded board so far.

    We work in very hot greenhouses, so fans (and peltiers) are essential. And proper thermal sensors. I check 4 different ones. Esp. needed is also a humidity sensor, because we don't want it to cool down below the dew point.

    It's PWM, controlled via mraa. mraa_pwm_write()

    • elevation 8 hours ago
      > peltiers) are essential

      Peltiers have a lifetime measured in cycles, cycling from active (maximum delta Temp) to inactive (both sides ambient). After 1-2k cycles, Peltiers gradually lose efficiency and transition from a heat pump to a hot plate. For this reason I've avoided them in my own permanent installations. Have you encountered this?

    • uticus 4 hours ago
      > peltiers

      First time I've come across this technology. A solid-state heat pump? Magic!

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermoelectric_heat_pump

  • Chepko932 11 hours ago
    Glad you shared this. I ran into something similar when I tried using a Pico W as a USB HID device, hardware was up to the task, but the firmware just wouldn’t let me get where I wanted..

    Using Arduino and serial is a smart way to go here. Still, it’s worth remembering: the Pico W has built-in WiFi, so you don’t have to lean on serial if you don’t want to. You could have your temp-reading app send control signals over HTTP instead. No need to tie up the USB port, and the connection isn’t killed if someone yanks the cable.

    And yes, big agreement on the watchdog or failsafe. Any fan controller that doesn’t ramp up to 100% if it loses connection is just waiting for trouble. Fire risk is real.

  • realaccfromPL 14 hours ago
    This looks really good! I am trying to do the same thing for cooling 11th gen Intel laptop motherboards with micro RP2050 board but came to the conclusion that I should just do it with ESP32 as mine has some limitations.

    Would you mind sharing more technical review of what you created?

    • zeroflow 13 hours ago
      RP2050 would work, as it also has the necessary built-in peripherals. ESP32 would add wifi and better ESPHome support. I suggest you stay away from the ESP8266, as it needs to do PWM in software and struggles with the 25kHz output frequency.

      From my experience: ESP32/RP2040 work without additional circuitry which works with most fans, but for protection, you want to add level shifters. Not all fans pull up the PWM pin to 3.3V, the spec allows for 5V.

      Shameless plug, hopefully this is allowed here.

      I built something like that, that allows fan control via WiFi. First I built it only for myself, but since the spare boards from PCBA quickly sold, I decided to keep it stocked.

      Short gist: 12V Input, ESP32S2, ESPHome-based. Has 4 PWM-fan outputs, onboard temperature & humidity sensor and Qwiic expansion port.

      The ESPHome code & schematic is on Github: https://github.com/zeroflow/wifi-fancontroller

      If you want one, it's available on Elecrow for $35,99: https://www.elecrow.com/wifi-fancontroller1.html

      If you want to build it by yourself, the schematic is in the hardware folder. And if you don't want to use ESPHome - there is no firmware lock, you find the pin assignment on the product page and can write your own firmware if you so desire.