Multicast TV Distribution on My Home Network

(apalrd.net)

34 points | by mrngm 3 hours ago

2 comments

  • urams 1 hour ago
    Interestingly multicast is used extensively by exchanges to distribute trading data to participants. I think it's the primary commercial usage outside of some IoT things.
  • NoMoreNicksLeft 2 hours ago
    I'm not sure I understand the point. For small home networks, there is no bandwidth difference between this and streaming solutions like Jellyfin. Yes, this was a cool technology, and if some large provider like AT&T wanted to use this to broadcast channels to everyone at once it would've made more sense than streaming... but even for that use case the world has moved on. Does anyone watch scheduled television anymore except local news and sportsball?
    • UqWBcuFx6NV4r 28 minutes ago
      Yes. I watched scheduled TV less than 3 (waking) hours ago.

      I have a gigabit down, and a ~50TB local Plex server.

      Sometimes, well… often, it’s just nice to channel-surf as a low-commitment way to find something to watch, to be surprised by something, etc. I’ll otherwise frequently be paralysed by choice and/or fall back on the same playlist of shows, over and over.

      Plenty of others online have documented similar experiences. It’s why there’s an ecosystem of projects looking to emulate traditional TV experiences using Plex / local media libraries. To use a Claude-ism: it’s not just nostalgia-bait, there are genuine advantages to watching things this way. I’ve been doing it long enough for any novelty / shine to have worn off.

      • zx8080 23 minutes ago
        What's a "waking hour"?
    • toast0 1 hour ago
      > if some large provider like AT&T wanted to use this to broadcast channels to everyone at once it would've made more sense than streaming...

      AT&T does (or did) use multicast for cable tv replacement...

    • ssl-3 1 hour ago
      > I'm not sure I understand the point.

      To demonstrate...multicast TV distribution on a home network?

      > For small home networks, there is no bandwidth difference between this and streaming solutions like Jellyfin.

      Jellyfin and multicast TV distribution are not the same things, though. They're very different.

      Some other things that are very different include: The temperature of Lake Superior, my mother's collection of weird ceramic houses that light up, and red herring.

      > Yes, this was a cool technology,

      Multicast has ceased to be a cool technology? That's hot.

      > and if some large provider like AT&T wanted to use this to broadcast channels to everyone at once

      They do that.

      > it would've made more sense than streaming

      They do that, as well.

      > but even for that use case the world has moved on.

      All of it? Uniformly?

      > Does anyone watch scheduled television anymore except local news and sportsball?

      We should not use multicast TV distribution on home networks for local news and sportsball?

    • blacklion 2 hours ago
      IPTV from your ISP is typically multicast (even if your connection is point-to-point), and if you have more than one network behind your router (for example, you have separate networks for wire clients, owner's wifi and guests wifi) you need to understand hot it works to setup your router correctly that you can watch IPTV on any device in any of yours networks.