Jev in practice: typed decisions, scoped authority

(tenuo.ai)

27 points | by niyikiza 2 hours ago

7 comments

  • 0123456789ABCDE 10 minutes ago
    this is such a trivial thing to do in DSPY, no one bothered to give it a name…

    here's 7 lines

      import os
      import dspy
    
      lm = dspy.LM("openrouter/z-ai/glm-5.3-flash", api_key=os.environ["OPENROUTER_API_KEY"])
      jev = dspy.Predict('email:str -> choice:Literal["Legitimate", "Spam", "Phishing"]')
      email = "Payroll asks for your password on a non-company sign-in page."
      pred = jev(email=email, lm=lm)
      print(pred.choice)
    
    there are other options, obviously. you can choose to give it some tools, maybe some reasoning stage before picking a choice, and that's on top of the "reasoning" the llm model already does api side
  • gyre007 1 hour ago
    Shockingly vibed blog post. Actually hurt my brain reading this and I had to stop.
  • chstr_9 11 minutes ago
    Haven't seen many attempts to govern agents using task bound authority. Curious to see how this holds up in real world implementation.
  • fuzzumms 1 hour ago
    Interesting way to guarantee some sort of safety for automated decisioning
    • niyikiza 38 minutes ago
      Tenuo guarantees the agent's actions stay within the defined boundaries but it doesn't influence what the agent "thinks" about or what it decides to do within those boundaries
  • dj0_ 1 hour ago
    The task bound idea is interesting. I’m starting to hear more of this theoretically on AI enterprise architecture. Has anyone actually implemented it successfully?
  • ozs 1 hour ago
    Interesting to experiment with. As AI agents get faster and cheaper (and thus more accessible) having good governance around their actions becomes more important to cut down on shadow agents/runaway agentic actions and consequences
  • luka2233 1 hour ago
    [dead]